読んだ▽
最初から4分の1はおもしろかった。
>What Is the Difference between Leader and Manager? First, all managers are leaders; however, leaders don’t necessarily need to be managers. Being a leader is not a position. No one can be promoted to be a leader. It’s only your own choice if you decide to become one. Everyone can become a leader, it’s only your own decision.
すき
>In an agile organization, where hierarchy becomes less important, we put more focus on leadership than on management. There is no positional authority given to a leader.
それな。
この本にでてきた、いくつかがわからなかったのでしらべた。
1️⃣モダンアジャイル▽
＞Modern Agileとは 初期のXP(Extreme Programming)賛同者、Joshua Kerievsky が世界最大のアジャイルカンファレンスである Agile2016 の基調講演において、モダンアジャイルというコンセプトを披露しました（→InfoQ記事）。 2001年に宣言されたアジャイルマニフェストが、15年を経ましたが、今の時点でアジャイルを再度考えてみよ
日本の方によるまとめ▽
>Joshuaはアジャイルソフトウェア開発宣言の「計画に従うよりも変化への対応を」を受動的であると批判しています。モダンアジャイルでは「実験をして本当に必要なものを得る」という能動的に捉えるのだと話しています。
2️⃣サーバントリーダーシップ
いや正直好きではなくて、全員サーバントリーダーシップに走ったら後続の人そだたなくない？自由意志ある？という気持ちだった。
が、そもそもどこからはじまった議論なのか知らなかったが、ここスタートだった▽
http://www.ediguys.net/Robert_K_Greenleaf_The_Servant_as_Leader.pdf
ながいけど引用。
＞The servant-leader is servant first - as Leo was portrayed. It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first. Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead. That person is sharply different from one who is leader first, perhaps because of the need to assuage an unusual power drive or to acquire material possessions. For such it will be a later choice to serve - after leadership is established. The leader-first and the servant-first are two extreme types. Between them there are shadings and blends that are part of the infinite variety of human nature.The difference manifests itself in the care taken by the servant-first to make sure that other people's highest priority needs are being served. The best test, and difficult to administer, is: Do those served grow as persons? Do they, while being served, become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, more likely themselves to become servants? And, what is the effect on the least privileged in society; will they benefit, or, at least, not be further deprived?As one sets out to serve, how can one know that this will be the result? This is part of the human dilemma; one cannot know for sure. One must, after some study and experience, hypothesize — but leave the hypothesis under a shadow of doubt. Then one acts on the hypothesis and examines the result. One continues to study and learn and periodically one re-examines the hypothesis itself.Finally, one chooses again. Perhaps one chooses the same hypothesis again and again.But it is always a fresh open choice. And it is always an hypothesis under a shadow of doubt. "Faith is the choice of the nobler hypothesis." Not the noblest; one never knows what that is. But the nobler, the best one can see when the choice is made. Since the test of results of one's actions is usually long delayed, the faith that sustains the choice of the nobler hypothesis is psychological self-insight. This is the most dependable part of the true servant.
漂うプロテスタントみを感じた。そもそも反戦(ベトナム戦争の時期)や宗教的な側面から発生した主張で、ビジネスサイドに取り込まれたのはしばらくしてからのよう。